CF-05Energy / industrialTexas, US

The analysis that arrived finished

A Texas energy-procurement advisory

8.0%positive-reply rate
34,400sends771replies62positive

The problem

Energy procurement is a commodity pitch in Texas. Every facility manager has deleted 100 of these emails. The offer had to arrive as work already performed, not work being sold.

The mechanism

Each sequence claimed something specific and true: a rate analysis for facilities like the prospect's, already prepared, with 3 quick wins identified.

The call to action asked for permission, not time: "worth sharing?" instead of "book a call". Micro-commitment first, calendar later.

Raw funnel: 34,400 sends across 12,708 prospects, 771 replies, 62 positive.

Read the number honestly

Positive replies are counted against 771 total replies, not against prospects. The 8.0% positive-reply rate is 62 of 771 replies, from 34,400 sent. The raw chain prints so the denominator stays visible.

Get this level of honesty about your own GTM.

The teardown reads your funnel the way these files are written: raw counts, named mechanisms, no theater.